While the portal will remain open for the remainder of the year, anything submitted after April 1 will be considered late and could result in penalties from the DFEH. The agency issued over35,000 non-compliance notices for the 2020 reporting year.
The agency is still processing the 2020 filings and will be making the information available to the general public in the coming weeks.
All private employers that file the federal EEO-1 report and have 100 or more employees, with at least one working in California need to comply with California’s SB 973 pay data reporting requirements.
A common misconception is that SB 973 is strictly a California law, but in reality, it can apply to any organization that meets the aforementioned criteria. It only takes one employee working in California to effectuate the pay data reporting obligations for your organization.
Total number of employees listed by sex, race, and ethnicity in executive or senior-level positions and managers, first or mid-level officials and managers, professionals, technicians, sales, administrative support, craft workers, operatives, laborers, and helpers, and service positions.
The number of employees listed by sex, race, and ethnicity in each of the pay bands used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor of Statistics and the Occupational Employment Statistics Survey.
The total number of hours worked for each employee in every pay band.
As a reminder, the California SB 973 pay data reporting is based on a payroll period snapshot during the fourth quarter of the previous year. So, for this upcoming April 1, 2022 deadline, employers would need to submit a snapshot of a payroll period during the fourth quarter of 2021.
To prepare for the snapshot, organizations are encouraged to conduct a pay equity audit sometime during the beginning of the year so that they can identify, address, and correct pay disparities throughout the remainder of the year.
This way, once it comes time to select a pay period cycle during the fourth quarter, you know exactly what your compensation data looks like and can file with confidence.
This proactive approach will help ensure the DFEH doesn’t discover illegal pay practices. While penalties regarding SB 973 are still unclear, recent legislation in SB 1162 would give the agency the power to penalize employers up to $200 per employee.
To learn more about California’s SB 973 pay data reporting law, download the white paper below.
California’s SB 1162 introduced never-before seen reporting obligations for employers, with serious penalties for those that fail to comply. Our SB 1162 white paper explains everything employers must know to satisfy the law’s requirements and includes real-world examples for helping organizations of all sizes and locations understand how it affects them.